From Digital Savior to Newsroom Cutter
When Jeff Bezos bought The Washington Post in 2013 for 250 million dollars, many journalists felt hopeful. He had built Amazon into a global giant and seemed willing to invest in the future of news. At first, he promised to protect the paper’s independence and let the newsroom do its job.
However, more than a decade later, critics argue that his ownership has weakened one of America’s most respected newspapers.
A Legacy Paper in Decline
The Post once stood at the center of American journalism. It exposed Watergate, challenged government secrecy during the Pentagon Papers era, and produced generations of top reporters and editors. For decades, it shaped political debate in Washington and across the country.
Yet the media world changed fast. Advertising revenue collapsed as readers moved online. Many newspapers shut down, and others cut staff to survive. While these pressures affected the entire industry, critics say Bezos failed to adapt the Post in a clear and steady way.
Instead, waves of layoffs shrank the newsroom. Most recently, about 300 journalists lost their jobs. Many respected reporters and editors left or were pushed out. As a result, readers began to question what remained of the once powerful institution.
Political Tensions and Editorial Shifts
At first, Bezos kept some distance from politics. During Donald Trump’s first term, the Post adopted the slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” That line reflected its watchdog role.
But in 2024, a major shift sparked backlash. The editorial board prepared to endorse Kamala Harris. Bezos stepped in and blocked the endorsement just days before the election. Although owners have that authority, the late decision angered readers. Soon after, more than 250,000 subscribers canceled.
Later, Bezos directed the opinion section to focus on personal liberty and free markets while limiting opposing viewpoints. That decision led to resignations from senior editors and further criticism from former staff.
Meanwhile, Bezos appeared to repair ties with Trump. Amazon donated to the inauguration, and Bezos attended high profile events with the president. To critics, these moves suggested he prioritized business interests over newsroom independence.
Business Losses and Brand Damage
The Post reportedly lost around 100 million dollars last year. Clearly, Bezos has the right to seek financial stability. Still, observers argue that cost cutting alone cannot restore trust or rebuild quality journalism.
Former editors and media commentators described the situation as self inflicted brand damage. They believe the paper has lost both talent and identity. When management even restricted coverage of its own layoffs, many saw that as a turning point.
Time to Let Go?
Bezos’ personal wealth has soared since buying the Post. Given that reality, some ask why he continues to hold onto a struggling asset that draws constant criticism.
Supporters say the paper could still recover under new leadership. Others fear the damage runs too deep.
Either way, The Washington Post no longer resembles the newsroom that once set the standard for American journalism. If Bezos no longer believes in its mission, many argue he should sell it to someone who does.
