Would You Keep Talking to Someone After They Die
If someone close to you passed away tomorrow, would you still want to speak with them?
Instead of relying on memories alone, imagine chatting with a system that responds in their voice and tone. Today, that possibility exists. AI deathbots allow users to interact with digital versions of people who have died.
In recent years, several technology companies have entered the digital afterlife market. These platforms collect texts, emails, recordings, and social media posts. Then they use that data to recreate speech patterns and personality traits. As a result, users can receive replies that feel personal and familiar.
The industry is now worth more than £100 billion. Because of this rapid growth, researchers have started asking serious questions about emotional impact.
How Researchers Are Examining AI Deathbots
Dr Jenny Kidd from Cardiff University led a detailed study on this subject. Her research appeared in the journal Memory, Mind and Media. She described the findings as fascinating yet unsettling.
Along with Eva Nieto McAvoy and Bethan Jones, Kidd explored how these systems function in real situations. The team analyzed how AI tools imitate tone, vocabulary, and conversational style. Although companies promote them as comforting tools, the technology depends entirely on stored digital traces.
In other words, these systems rebuild a person from fragments of past data. They do not think or feel. Instead, they predict responses based on patterns. Therefore, the version users interact with may seem real, but it remains a constructed simulation.
A Personal Experience with Digital Memory
One man decided to preserve his father’s voice after learning about his terminal illness. Before his father passed away, he recorded long conversations and saved meaningful stories. Later, he created a chatbot using those recordings.
He admitted that the tool did not erase his grief. However, it offered a different kind of comfort. At times, he described it as an interactive memory archive. Through it, he could revisit familiar phrases and shared humor. For him, that ongoing access helped maintain a sense of closeness.
Experts Warn About Emotional Limits
Support organizations report rising curiosity about AI deathbots. Even so, widespread adoption remains limited.
Jacqueline Gunn, founder of Workplace Bereavement, believes caution is necessary. According to her, these systems are only as accurate as the data provided. Moreover, they cannot adapt as human grief evolves.
Grief changes over time. It requires patience, reflection, and connection with others. While technology may offer temporary reassurance, it cannot replace genuine human relationships. For that reason, experts suggest people treat AI tools as supplements rather than substitutes.
Ethical Questions Around Identity
Beyond emotional concerns, researchers also raise ethical issues. An AI recreation reflects selected data, not the whole person. Consequently, it presents a simplified version of identity.
Questions about consent, privacy, and digital ownership continue to grow. As technology advances, society must decide how to manage digital identities after death. The digital afterlife promises connection. At the same time, it forces us to rethink memory, loss, and what it means to remain present.
