Tag: YouthJustice

Court Case Overview Three teenage boys were convicted of multiple rape offences involving two girls in separate incidents in Hampshire during 2024 and 2025. The court later gave them youth rehabilitation orders instead of custody, which led to public criticism and legal review. One victim was assaulted in an underpass near the River Avon. The cases involved serious charges, with a total of ten rape convictions across the defendants. The sentencing judge later released full remarks that explain how the decision was reached. Background of the Offences Two boys, both fourteen at the time, were found guilty of raping a fifteen year old girl in November 2024 in Fordingbridge. In a separate incident in January 2025, the same two boys raped another fourteen year old girl in the same area. A third boy, aged thirteen at the time, was found guilty of rape for assisting in the second attack. Evidence on Mental and Developmental Conditions The sentencing hearing included detailed expert reports on the boys’ cognitive and neurological conditions. One boy, referred to as J, had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and mild cognitive difficulties. The judge said these issues did not remove responsibility for his actions. Another boy, referred to as N, was assessed as having an intelligence level in the lowest one percent compared with others his age. Experts also identified severe neurological impairment and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Reports indicated he struggled significantly in normal schooling and functioned at a much younger developmental level. His family described him as behaving closer to a young child. The third boy, referred to as E, was assessed as having very low intellectual ability and limited understanding of consent. Judges Reasoning on Sentencing The judge explained that sentencing children requires a different approach from adults. The focus must remain on rehabilitation and long term outcomes rather than punishment alone. He stated that custody should be used only when absolutely necessary. After reviewing all reports, he concluded that detention was not appropriate in this case. The judge also said that one boy’s impairments reduced his level of responsibility, but did not remove it entirely. He emphasized that each young person must be judged individually based on development, understanding, and ability to grasp consequences. Legal Outcome and Next Steps All three boys received youth rehabilitation orders rather than custodial sentences. The decision has been referred for further legal review following strong public reaction.
Crime and Justice

Teen Rape Case Sentencing Explained After Judge Releases Full Remarks

Court Case Overview Three teenage boys were convicted of multiple rape offences…

Register Lost your password?