Politics

UN Security Council decides not to lift Iran sanctions, but still time to agree delay

Pakistan, Russia, China, and Algeria voted in favour of the draft text; nine members voted against and two abstained.

1 Min Read

A draft resolution to permanently lift sanctions on Iran was not adopted by the UN Security Council on Friday, but Tehran and major European nations still have eight days to try to reach an agreement on a postponement.

After Britain, France, and Germany began a 30-day process on August 28 to reimpose UN sanctions, accusing Tehran of not adhering to a 2015 agreement with world powers that sought to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon, the 15-member UN Security Council was forced to vote on the draft resolution on Friday. Iran denies intending to do so.

On Friday, the draft document was approved by Algeria, Pakistan, China, and Russia. Two members abstained, and nine members voted against.

You Might Also Like

US Senate approves $70bn immigration funding package linked to Trump agencies

Andrew Earned Rental Income From Royal Lodge Cottages, Watchdog Report Reveals

Trump and Netanyahu Phone Call Sparks Diplomatic Tension

Breakthrough Ovarian Cancer Drug Improves Survival and Daily Life

India and Venezuela discuss stronger oil trade ties during high level visit

Share This Article
Previous Article To find Russian agents and obtain secrets, British spies use the dark web.
Next Article US has talked with Gulf states about post-war Gaza administration, envoy says
Leave a comment

Stay Connected

- Advertisement -

Latest News

US Senate approves $70bn immigration funding package linked to Trump agencies Senate passes major immigration spending bill The US Senate has approved a funding package worth more than $70bn for immigration enforcement agencies under President Donald Trump’s administration. The bill now moves to the House of Representatives for approval before reaching the president’s desk for signing. The vote passed 52 to 47, mostly along party lines. Only one Republican senator opposed it, joining Democrats in rejecting the measure during a long overnight session. Funding boost for ICE and Border Patrol A large share of the funding will go to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol. These agencies are central to Trump’s ongoing immigration enforcement agenda. If fully approved, the money will support operations for the remaining three years of the administration. Heated debate over controversial provisions The Senate session included an 18-hour amendment process known as a vote-a-rama. During this time, lawmakers introduced several changes, many of which failed. Democrats tried to restrict a proposed $1.8bn fund tied to claims of government overreach. Critics described it as a politically sensitive slush fund, while supporters defended its purpose. The proposal also faced controversy after acting Attorney General Todd Blanche suggested earlier in the week that the fund might be dropped. Trump later said the decision was not final and indicated legal review was still ongoing. Political divide and shutdown background Democrats previously refused to support ICE and Customs and Border Protection funding earlier this year. That standoff followed fatal shootings involving federal immigration officers in Minnesota and contributed to a partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security. Other budget changes Lawmakers also removed $1bn previously allocated for a planned White House ballroom from the spending package before the final vote. House vote next The bill now heads to the House of Representatives. If it passes there, it will go to President Trump for final approval.
US Senate approves $70bn immigration funding package linked to Trump agencies
Politics United States
NASA astronauts take shelter as ISS air leak worsens Emergency response on the International Space Station Astronauts aboard the International Space Station moved into a safety protocol after engineers detected a rising air leak. Five crew members sheltered inside the docked SpaceX Dragon Freedom spacecraft when pressure levels began to drop faster than expected. The Dragon capsule acted as a safe return option in case evacuation became necessary. Crew members wore spacesuits and stayed ready for a quick return to Earth if conditions got worse. Repair attempt in the Russian segment At the same time, two Russian cosmonauts stayed inside the station to work on the affected area. They focused on a transfer tunnel connected to the Zvezda service module in the Russian section. The leak had been monitored for several years, but recent readings showed a sharper loss of air. That change pushed teams to move beyond small fixes and try a more serious repair effort. Temporary shelter and stand down order As conditions improved slightly, mission control instructed the sheltering astronauts to return from the Dragon capsule back into the station. The repair work was paused to reassess the situation safely. The Soyuz MS 28 spacecraft remained available as an additional emergency escape option for the Russian crew during the operation. Long running issue on the ISS The cracks linked to the leak have been present for about six years, creating repeated concerns for mission teams. Earlier cargo activity near the station recently appeared to change pressure levels again, which triggered renewed attention to the problem. Space agencies continue to monitor the section closely while planning more durable repairs.
NASA astronauts take shelter as ISS air leak worsens
Information Technology
Primavera Sound fans express frustration after major headline acts were cancelled due to severe weather in Barcelona
Primavera Sound Faces Backlash After Major Acts Cancelled Due to Storm Conditions
Sports
Court Case Overview Three teenage boys were convicted of multiple rape offences involving two girls in separate incidents in Hampshire during 2024 and 2025. The court later gave them youth rehabilitation orders instead of custody, which led to public criticism and legal review. One victim was assaulted in an underpass near the River Avon. The cases involved serious charges, with a total of ten rape convictions across the defendants. The sentencing judge later released full remarks that explain how the decision was reached. Background of the Offences Two boys, both fourteen at the time, were found guilty of raping a fifteen year old girl in November 2024 in Fordingbridge. In a separate incident in January 2025, the same two boys raped another fourteen year old girl in the same area. A third boy, aged thirteen at the time, was found guilty of rape for assisting in the second attack. Evidence on Mental and Developmental Conditions The sentencing hearing included detailed expert reports on the boys’ cognitive and neurological conditions. One boy, referred to as J, had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and mild cognitive difficulties. The judge said these issues did not remove responsibility for his actions. Another boy, referred to as N, was assessed as having an intelligence level in the lowest one percent compared with others his age. Experts also identified severe neurological impairment and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Reports indicated he struggled significantly in normal schooling and functioned at a much younger developmental level. His family described him as behaving closer to a young child. The third boy, referred to as E, was assessed as having very low intellectual ability and limited understanding of consent. Judges Reasoning on Sentencing The judge explained that sentencing children requires a different approach from adults. The focus must remain on rehabilitation and long term outcomes rather than punishment alone. He stated that custody should be used only when absolutely necessary. After reviewing all reports, he concluded that detention was not appropriate in this case. The judge also said that one boy’s impairments reduced his level of responsibility, but did not remove it entirely. He emphasized that each young person must be judged individually based on development, understanding, and ability to grasp consequences. Legal Outcome and Next Steps All three boys received youth rehabilitation orders rather than custodial sentences. The decision has been referred for further legal review following strong public reaction.
Teen Rape Case Sentencing Explained After Judge Releases Full Remarks
Crime and Justice
Register Lost your password?