Trump Considers Rare Executive Power in Minnesota
Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., criticized President Donald Trump’s recent threats targeting her state, calling them “tantamount to declaring war.” The warnings followed Trump’s suggestion that he might invoke the rarely used Insurrection Act as ICE agents confronted agitators in Minneapolis.
Smith said, “The president’s statements today essentially amount to threats of declaring war on Minnesota. At a time when we should focus on safety and solutions, he continues to escalate tensions dangerously.”
Understanding the Insurrection Act
The Insurrection Act, first enacted in 1807, allows the president to deploy military forces to quell rebellions or enforce federal law. Historically, it has been triggered only 30 times in over 200 years, with the most recent use by President George H.W. Bush during the 1992 Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict.
Trump mentioned the Act in a Truth Social post, warning, “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of ICE, I would pull the trigger.” Later, he told reporters, “If I needed it, I’d use it. I don’t think there’s any reason right now to use it, but it’s very powerful.”
Reactions from Lawmakers
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged that Trump has made similar threats in other states. He said, “Hopefully, local officials are working with federal law enforcement and ICE, while local law enforcement settles matters on the ground.”
Meanwhile, Congress continues to debate funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE, especially after the recent fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. The latest DHS funding bill, part of a four-bill $1.2 trillion package, imposes reporting requirements on agency operations and detention facilities but does not cut the budget.
Political and Public Implications
The ongoing tensions highlight the rare intersection of presidential power and federal law enforcement. Critics argue Trump’s threats could worsen the situation in Minnesota, while supporters contend that emergency authority exists to maintain order during unrest. As debates over DHS funding and ICE operations continue, the state remains under national scrutiny.
