The case raises the question of whether lower court judges, as they have in this instance, should have the authority to halt presidential directives for the entire nation. After taking into account both perspectives, the justices didn’t seem to agree.
The US solicitor general contended that subordinate courts should have less power because they had overreached themselves.
Speaking on behalf of several states, the solicitor general of New Jersey countered that supporting Trump would result in a patchwork system of citizenship.
“Chaos on the ground” would result from this, the lawyer Jeremy Feigenbaum contended.
When the court will make its ruling is unclear. Trump might carry on with his extensive use of executive orders if it supports his views.
